Meet The Entrepreneur Helping Women In Chemo Keep Their Hair

Kate Dilligan spent $8,000 to save her hair during cancer treatments, then spent another $40,000 to see if there was a better way. There was.

0x0

COOLER HEADS 

When 45-year-old Jennifer Graff was diagnosed with breast cancer in August, one of her first thoughts was for the women she sees as an obstetrician-gynecologist. Graff knew she’d be capable of working through the prescribed 12 rounds of chemotherapy. She worried, however, about how patients would react when they saw one of chemo’s more insidious side-effects — hair loss.

 “I was concerned that they would see me with no hair and think I look sick,” Graff says, “and wonder, ‘How can she take care of my baby?’”
 Today, Graff is eight rounds in and still has 90% of her hair. It’s what happens when science meets entrepreneurial chutzpah: Graff is using the Amma cap, a portable scalp-cooling device that’s the brainchild of entrepreneur Kate Dilligan and her startup, Cooler Heads.

Dilligan founded Cooler Heads in 2018 after spending $8,000 to save her own hair during breast cancer treatment the year before. Scalp-cooling, which some patients say feels like having an ice pack on your head, can help many patients save all or most of their hair from falling out, a common side-effect of chemo, because the cold constricts blood vessels and prevents the cancer-fighting chemicals from reaching hair follicles. But Dilligan’s experience was unwieldy and expensive, necessitating the help of a white-glove service to put dry ice packs on her head every 20 to 30 minutes while chemicals were pumped into her body. The process worked, but left Dilligan convinced there was a better way.

 “How do you create something that’s portable, affordable and fully patient-administered, so you’re not relying on other people?” Dilligan says.
She spent $40,000 of her own savings to answer the question. A Stanford business school graduate and longtime technology executive, Dilligan tapped into her network to find design engineers to investigate the physics around a portable capping system and then build and test a prototype. She wanted a headpiece that was flexible and secure enough to stay on any person’s head and a cooling unit that would stay connected to the cap and remain near-freezing even after it unplugged from a power source and traveled with a patient.

Dilligan joined a tech accelerator in San Diego, where she lives, and raised $1.4 million in a seed round in 2019, which helped her complete the prototype. By December 2021, the Cooler Heads Amma cap had been cleared for commercialization by the Food and Drug Administration, allowing Dilligan to raise another $2.4 million in venture funding. She launched to the public in July with the intent of renting caps directly to consumers or selling them to chemo infusion centers, so they could rent them to patients. However, due to a combination of demand and recent changes in Medicare billing procedures, Dilligan is currently focusing solely on selling to infusion centers.

Cooler Heads did over a quarter-million dollars in sales in its first two months on the market, Dilligan says. “Demand is really, really strong.”

Julie Gralow, the chief medical officer and executive vice president of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, says that Cooler Heads is a smart product hitting the market at the right time. Two of the company’s non-portable competitors, the Paxman and Dignicap, received FDA clearance in 2017, and Medicare’s 2021 improvement in the way hospitals and clinics could bill for scalp cooling helped expand access. Gralow was a practicing oncologist for three decades and says that it was only “during maybe the last five years of my practice that [cold capping] started becoming practical.”

Gralow says one problem with the existing systems is that they take up valuable real estate in chemo infusion centers. “You have to plug them in to have the coolant circulating, [and] you have to put the cap on anywhere from 30 minutes to a couple of hours in advance of the treatment and then keep it on after,” she says. With a limited number of chairs and other cancer patients needing their own chemo, there are few business incentives for infusion centers to let cold-capping patients stay after their infusion ends. Cooler Heads’ mobile device solves that problem.

“I think it’s an important advance,” Nancy Marshall, the cofounder of nonprofit The Rapunzel Project. In 2010, Marshall and her friend Shirley Billigmeier founded the Rapunzel Project as a way to educate patients on how to access and pay for scalp cooling after Billigmeier successfully used the therapy to keep her hair during breast cancer treatment in 2009. Marshall has seen other entrepreneurs try to tackle the portability and cost issues, but says, “Kate is the first one who was able to develop an actual viable product and bring it to market.”

Dilligan sells the Cooler Heads Amma cap to infusion centers for $1,250, but the cost to users depends on insurance coverage. As Marshall puts it, insurance on scalp-cooling is “all over the place. We tell everybody to apply for coverage and appeal a denial, but not to assume that it’s ever going to get approved.”

Dilligan argues that scalp-cooling is a medical necessity, pointing to studies that indicate a plurality of women consider chemo-induced hair loss to be the most “traumatic” aspect of chemotherapy and nearly 10% say they’d decline treatment just to avoid it.

So it isn’t about vanity. Many women say it’s about their identity. Dilligan “is giving dignity and confidence to anybody who’s going through chemo and cancer,” says Silvia Mah, a General Partner at Stella Impact Capital and one of Cooler Heads’ investors. And she’s doing it in a way, Mah says, that “incentivizes the infusion centers to serve more patients at a higher standard of care.”

Dilligan says she was sitting recently with a patient who was using the Amma cap who’d had a mastectomy. “She said the thought of losing her hair was more upsetting than losing a breast,” Dilligan says.

Obstetrician-gynecologist Graff and other cold-cap patients say that scalp-cooling gives patients the ability to reclaim a bit of control during a time when so much else is uncontrollable.

“We lose so much, especially for those of us who end up having a mastectomy, and it’s just a lot that happens really fast,” Graff says. “Having been a patient herself, Kate understands how much hope is packaged in that little device and she doesn’t take it lightly.”

Merck puts big bucks behind ADC alliance with China’s Kelun

Merck & Co’s efforts to diversify its cancer pipeline beyond immunotherapy blockbuster Keytruda have taken a big step forward with a wide-ranging alliance with China’s Kelun-Biotech that spans seven antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in early development.

Merck_and_co_HQ-605x340

Merck is paying a relatively modest $175 million upfront to secure rights to the programmes, along with an undisclosed equity investment, but the combined value of the deal could reach an eye-watering $9.3 billion if all seven make it through to market and hit commercial objectives.

The deal extends an earlier collaboration between Merck and Kelun on two ADCs, including a TROP2-targeting candidate called MK-2870 that has already made it through to late-stage clinical testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The MK-2870 agreement had a reported top-line value of $1.4 billion, according to Chinese media group Yicai Global, with the second for an as-yet-unidentified ADC having a value of around %950 million.

For some time, industry observers have been asking what Merck can do to reduce its reliance on Keytruda (pembrolizumab), which is on course to make in the region of $20 billion in sales this year, around a third of the company’s total revenues.

Merck has traditionally relied more on its internal R&D capabilities than mergers and acquisitions to grow its business, but new chief executive Robert Davis said earlier this year that approach would change.

ADCs have emerged as one key part of Merck’s drive to diversify its cancer pipeline, for example with a $1 billion investment in Seagen in 2020 that gave it rights to the biotech’s LIV-1-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ladiratuzumab vedotin and follow-up candidates, plus another $600 million paid in cash.

Rumours that Merck was planning a $30 billion-plus takeover bid for Seagen have so far come to nothing, but it did complete a deal to buy VelosBio for $2.75 billion in late 2020 to add an ADC targeting ROR1 – zilovertamab vedotin (MK-2140) – which has now advanced into phase 3 for lymphoma.

“Advances in ADC technologies are yielding a new generation of candidates designed to more precisely target and deliver potent anticancer agents to the tumour site,” said Dean Li, president of Merck Research Laboratories.

“We continue to augment our oncology pipeline and look forward to working with the Kelun-Biotech team to advance these candidates to the patients that need them,” he added.

Under the agreement, Kelun retains the right to research, develop, manufacture, and commercialise certain licensed and optioned ADCs for mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.

Japanese drugmakers make greener packaging pledge

Four Japanese drugmakers – Astellas, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, and Takeda – have joined forces in a partnership intended to reduce the environmental impact of pharmaceutical packaging.

Drugs-generic-840x470

The companies say they will promote the use of greener packaging for their products by sharing knowledge on technologies that can reduce their environmental impact, including blister packs made of biomass- rather than petroleum-derived plastics and more compact packaging, as well as recycled and recyclable materials.

The collaboration comes as the pharma industry is increasingly having to face up to its impact on the environment, after years of avoiding scrutiny of its impact as a major manufacturer of goods.

A Forbes report published last year in the wake of the COP26 UN climate negotiations estimated that the 15 largest pharma manufacturers emitted 55% more carbon dioxide equivalents per million dollars of revenue than the automotive sector in 2015.

While there are big differences between companies, studies have suggested that the industry as a whole would need to a cut emissions by 59% from 2015 levels to meet the goals laid out in the Paris agreement of the same year.

Meanwhile, pharma products also generate non-degradable waste materials – known as environmentally persistent pharmaceutical pollutants (EPPPs) – with biological activity that is known to adversely affect ecosystems.

Astellas, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo, and Takeda said their new initiative aims to ensure that “society benefits from this collaboration to harmonise corporate activities with the global environment.” They also hope to recruit other companies to the collaboration in order to broaden its impact.

Among measures already being explored by the pharma industry is the development of recyclable and biodegradeable plastics derived from sugarcane – a concept developed by Natupharma – which has already been adopted by some drugmakers, including Astellas.

Last year, the company reported that it had begun using sugarcane-derived polyethylene (PE) as 50% of the raw material used in blister packaging, saying it was the world’s first widespread use of the material in commercial products.

It started using the sugarcane in its irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) drug Irribow (ramosetron), sold in Japan.

Other developments across the industry include greater use of aluminium foil as a 100% recyclable material, the elimination of secondary packaging for solid-dose drugs in glass containers, and the move towards digital package inserts.

BioNTech begins Phase I study of vaccine candidate for Malaria

BioNTech has commenced a first-in-human Phase I study of the first candidate from its malaria vaccine programme BNT165, BNT165b1.

960px-Maternal_malaria_placenta_-_cropped_-_very_high_mag

The company aims to develop the first mRNA-based vaccine to prevent Malaria using a new multi-antigen vaccine method.

Initially, it will assess a set of mRNA-encoded antigens of the malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) for identifying the multi-antigen vaccine candidate that will proceed into the planned later-stage studies.

The first clinical study has been designed for assessing the tolerability, exploratory immunogenicity, and safety of BNT165b1, which expresses certain circumsporozoite protein (CSP) parts.

Nearly 60 healthy people with no history of previous or current malaria infection are expected to be enrolled at US sites in the observer blinded, placebo-controlled Phase I dose escalation trial.

In the trial, BNT165b1 will be assessed at three dose levels.

BioNTech chief medical officer and co-founder Özlem Türeci said: “The trial initiation is an important milestone in our efforts to help address diseases with high unmet medical need. Our objective is to develop a vaccine that can help to prevent Malaria and reduce mortality.

“Over the next months we aim to evaluate different antigens with scientific rigor to identify the optimal candidate. In parallel, we are working on establishing manufacturing facilities on the African continent and other regions.

 “The containers for the first BioNTainer for the African network are ready for the transport to Rwanda. If successfully developed and approved, an mRNA-based Malaria vaccine could be manufactured there.”

BioNTech stated that the BNT165 programme is part of its Malaria project which was initially announced in July last year.

The project has two main objectives that include, development of a well-tolerated and effective mRNA vaccine with durable protective immunity for preventing blood-stage Malaria infection.

The other is to develop sustainable vaccine production as well as supply solutions in Africa, along with the company’s BioNTainer solution.

Year in review: who were the main DCT players in 2022?

As we count down to the end of 2022, we look at the sponsors, CROs, and sites that were at the top of the decentralised clinical trial (DCT) race. We also explore the countries where DCTs were frequently conducted.

Clinical Trials Arena has established an exclusive taxonomic approach that involves reviewing thousands of drug trial public records from 2022 that mentioned decentralisation terminology in the study protocols, as curated in the Clinical Trials Database by GlobalData, the parent company of Clinical Trials Arena. Decentralisation terminology includes DCT elements such as telemedicine, remote monitoring, digital data collection, and more.

Europeans are more DCT prone

The analysis shows that Takeda Pharmaceuticals decentralised 33% of its clinical trials in 2022, followed by Bayer (22%), Sanofi (17%), and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (17%).

 Screenshot 2022-12-26 at 23.29.17

To learn which sponsors were using DCT elements most frequently, Clinical Trials Arena exported a list of companies by their R&D expenditure from GlobalData’s Pharmaceutical Intelligence Center. The percentage of DCTs by each sponsor is calculated by dividing the number of DCTs in 2022 over the total number of trials (virtual and non-virtual trials).

While sponsors are not inclined to disclose whether they are using decentralisation elements in their clinical trials, such information can be incredibly useful when it comes to research, especially for real-world evidence or diversity, says Priya Nair, senior clinical trial analyst at GlobalData.

Additionally, transparency can benefit the entire pharmaceutical sector, as smaller biotechs can learn from big pharma companies about how to implement DCT elements in their clinical trials.

There are also benefits to disclosing information about failed trials. “The whole point of DCTs is to help that trial advance to the next phase or bring the drug to market,” Nair says. “If the trial failed, was it because of the DCT element, or why didn’t the DCT elements help the trial?”

 The analysis reveals that six out of 10 sponsors that disclosed decentralisation elements in their clinical trials are based in Europe. This is likely due to Europe trying to catch up with clinical trial trends in the US, Nair says. “The US has a massive push to use DCTs because the FDA guidance wants more diversity in trials, and diversity goes hand in hand with DCTs,” she explains.
The EMA recently released a recommendation paper on safety and data integrity in DCT conduct as a part of its Accelerating Clinical Trials in the EU (ACT EU) initiative. “The US leads on certain things, and then Europe picks [them] up,” says Nair.

DCT becoming a selling point for CROs

The analysis shows that the CROs which participated the most in trials with DCT elements were Avance Clinical (46%), CMAX Clinical Research (27%), and Quotient Sciences (14%).

Screenshot 2022-12-26 at 23.35.50

To calculate the DCT frequency by each CRO, Clinical Trials Arena compiled a list of companies with the highest number of trials (virtual and non-virtual trials) in 2022. The percentage of DCTs by each CRO is calculated by dividing the number of DCTs in 2022 over the total number of trials (virtual and non-virtual trials).

The CRO’s success in the DCT space depends on how well they are trained in decentralisation elements. Nair explains that if a CRO has integrated these elements into its business, it can become a great selling point when working with sponsors. “It takes the weight off the sponsors’ shoulders, and CROs will get more business. It’s a plus point for both sides,” she adds.

Sites and decentralisation

Clinical Trials Arena also looked at which sites were most involved in decentralised trials in 2022. The analysis shows that the sites with the most DCT involvement in 2022 were The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (23%), University Hospital of Virgen del Rocio (14%), and University Hospital La Fe de Valencia (14%).

To calculate the DCT frequency by each site, Clinical Trials Arena exported two lists of the top 100 trial sites according to the highest number of all trials (virtual and non-virtual) and DCTs alone from GlobalData’s Trial Sites Database. Once combined, 34 sites were present in both lists. Their DCT frequency was calculated by dividing the number of DCTs by the total number of trials. The data visualisation includes sites that have a DCT frequency of more than 6%.

Fully decentralised trials eliminate the need for a site. However, Nair says that sites will not entirely disappear, as certain therapy areas, such as oncology, depend on sites for blood collection or drug administration.

Additionally, patient preference is an important aspect to reduce patient burden. As previously reported on Clinical Trials Arena, some patients prefer to attend onsite as part of the clinical trial, rather than participate remotely. Still, remote sites and mobile research teams can also help ease patient burden by reducing the requirement to travel by bringing the trial to the patient’s home.

DCTs in the world map

The analysis shows that DCTs were more frequent in Western countries compared to Eastern countries, except Australia. The decentralisation of trials was most common in the UK (14%), Australia (12%), Canada (11%), and Poland (11%). The percentage of DCTs for each country was calculated by dividing the number of DCTs by the total number of trials (virtual and non-virtual trials) in 2022.

Screenshot 2022-12-26 at 23.38.26

Nair explains that the higher frequency of DCTs in Western countries is likely due to the better socioeconomic status and regulatory backing to integrate new elements within clinical trials in these countries. Additionally, participants in Eastern countries might be less inclined to disclose information virtually. “They probably have a preference of actually going in and seeing a doctor face to face,” she says.

However, the current trends are not set in stone. Nair says that Eastern countries may catch up in a few years due to technological advancements. “The data we see now is in the process of changing,” she adds.

Kira gets clearance for bifunctional biologic trial in China, Australia

The trials will assess the safety, efficacy, tolerability, PK and PD of KP104 in IgAN and C3G patients.

robina-weermeijer-szKjHyPq28-unsplash-3-e1671618958894

KIRA Pharmaceuticals has received clearances in China and Australia to commence Phase II clinical trials of investigational bifunctional biologic, KP104, for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G).

The Chinese National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) and the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) granted the approval.

The trials will assess the safety, efficacy, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of KP104 in IgAN and C3G patients in China and Australia. 

 Created to hinder the alternative and terminal complement pathways at the same time, KP104 has a dual-target mechanism of action.

Kira CEO Frederick Beddingfield said: “These clearances add to the multiple INDs Kira has secured this year for KP104 and mark our first in IgAN and C3G, serious immune-mediated conditions that cause kidney damage and often result in kidney failure. 

“We believe that KP104’s ability to simultaneously and synergistically block two key complement targets makes it a unique therapeutic option with the potential to make a profound impact on the lives of patients living with these kidney diseases around the world.”

According to the findings from the Phase I SYNERGY-1 trial, KP104 showed clinical proof of mechanism.

Earlier this year, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Orphan Drug Designation for the biologic to treat paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH). 

 At present, KP104 is being analysed in a Phase II study in PNH and the company has plans to analyse it for various haematology and nephrology indications.

An autoimmune ailment, IgAN damages the kidneys while C3G comprises dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis, which leads to glomeruli inflammation and damage in the kidney.

EU regulators publish new recommendations on decentralised trials

The recommendations are made to protect the rights and well-being of patients who participate in clinical trials.

 national-cancer-institute-X9Iq79PFif4-unsplash

The European Commission (EC), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) have published new recommendations aiming to facilitate the use of decentralised clinical trials (DCTs).

The new recommendations are also aimed at protecting the rights and well-being of those who participate in clinical trials along with the reliability of the collected data.

They are said to be an outcome of EC, EMA, and HMA’s joint initiative to Accelerate Clinical Trials in the European Union (ACT EU), which seeks to transform the process of clinical trials.

 Launched in January this year, the ACT EU initiative aims to further develop the EU as a centre for clinical research.

Clinical trials were usually conducted at specific clinical trial sites, where patients had to travel to.

DCTs aim is to simplify the process for patients to participate in trials by reducing the need to travel to central trial sites.

Decentralisation is enabled by digital tools, telemedicine, and more mobile and local healthcare advancement.

It includes remote monitoring and diagnostics, home health visits, electronic informed consent, and direct-to-patient shipment of study drugs.

 The regulators noted that DCTs have the potential to reduce drop-out rates and make clinical trials available to a wider demographic of population.

The recommendations include an overview of national provisions for specific DCT elements which need to be utilised in clinical trials.

They were compiled by the European medicines regulatory network of experts from regulatory bodies who are responsible for clinical trials authorisation, methodology experts, good clinical practice inspectors, patient organisations’ representatives, and members of ethic committees.

FDA approves first gene therapy for high-risk early bladder cancer

The first gene therapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer has been approved by The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

high-risk-non-muscle-invasive-bladder-cancer

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Adstiladrin (nadofaragene firadenovec-vncg) as the first gene therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in adults with high-risk Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive with carcinoma in situ (CIS) with or without papillary tumours.

Dr Peter Marks, PhD, Director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research observed that Adstiladrin, the non-replicating adenoviral vector-based therapy provides “… an innovative treatment option for patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer that is unresponsive to BCG therapy.”

Treatment and care of patients with high-risk NMIBC, including those with CIS often involves removing the tumour and the use of the BCG vaccine to reduce the risk that the cancer will recur. Few effective treatment options exist for patients who develop BCG-unresponsive disease.

 The failure to achieve a complete response (CR), or the disappearance of all signs of cancer as seen on cystoscopy, biopsied tissue, and urine, is associated with an increased risk of death or a disease-worsening event. Without treatment, the cancer can invade, damage tissues and organs, and spread through the body.

Clinical study of Adstiladrin

The safety and effectiveness of Adstiladrin was evaluated in a multicentre clinical study that included 157 patients with high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, 98 of whom had BCG-unresponsive CIS with or without papillary tumours and could be evaluated for response.

Patients received Adstiladrin once every three months via a urinary catheter into the bladder for up to 12 months, or until unacceptable toxicity to therapy or recurrent high-grade NMIBC. Overall, 51 percent of patients achieved a CR. The median duration of response was 9.7 months. The percentage of responding patients who remained in CR for at least one year was forty-six percent.

The most common adverse reactions (ARs) included bladder discharge, fatigue, bladder spasm, urinary urgency, haematuria (presence of blood in urine), chills, fever, and painful urination. The FDA stated that individuals who are immunosuppressed, or immune-deficient should not come into contact with Adstiladrin.

This application was granted Priority Review, Breakthrough Therapy, and Fast Track designations.

The FDA granted approval of Adstiladrin to Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S.

Clinical innovation: using digital solutions to deliver the next wave of medicines

Rapid progress in digital health technologies is enriching clinical trial design, improving clinical trial recruitment strategies and harnessing the power of clinical trial data to improve outcomes for patients and guide future research. Here, Natalie Fishburn, Cristina Duran and Serban Ghiorghiu, from R&D at AstraZeneca, discuss the evolving nature of clinical innovation in the age of precision medicine and how digital solutions are being used to enhance the experience for those involved in clinical trials.

Fishburn_feature-Image-750x500

In a typical year, AstraZeneca conducts over 240 global clinical trials, involving more than 123,000 patients in around 60 countries. For clinical innovation to deliver life-changing and potentially curative new medicines to patients as quickly and safely as possible, diverse digital and other technologies are increasingly being used to optimise clinical trials to get more medicines to more patients, faster than ever before. The move towards precision medicine is necessitating changes to the design and execution of clinical trials. The upsurge in digital healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic has catalysed changes in clinical trial recruitment and participation. The ambition is to use technological and digital solutions to reduce the burden for patients and trialists, so that clinical trial participation ultimately becomes part of daily practice.

Designing clinical trials with patients in mind

Incorporating the patient voice into the initial planning process of our trials ensures that our designs are manageable and understandable, as well as feasible and practical.

Much can be learned from previous clinical research. Through Merlin, an internal AstraZeneca artificial intelligence (AI) and predictive analysis tool, some of our study teams are aiming to optimise the design and cost of new trials based on experience from previous study designs, including reducing patient and investigator burden and carbon emissions. The data leveraged by Merlin can help to increase patient recruitment and create diverse patient cohorts that are more representative of the patients typically seen in clinical practice.

Optimising clinical trial design

To get medicines to patients faster, clinical trials need to be more efficient, with fewer delays and lower costs. Adaptive trials, basket studies, platform trials, synthetic control arms and dose optimisation studies are some of the options for achieving these goals.

Introducing real world control arms to clinical trials has the potential to reduce the need for placebos and the burden of study participation for both patients and investigators. Comparing novel agents with routine care could require fewer patients for the overall study. Using control data from matched patients in earlier studies could reduce the need for control arms altogether. Such options would require significant changes to current clinical trial regulations, but there is undoubted interest in their potential advantages for reducing trial burden.

Through advances in AI and digital technologies, novel endpoints are being identified to inform decision making and better capture the whole disease burden of patients in clinical trials, while reflecting the science and the needs of payers.

In oncology, novel biomarkers based on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) or circulating free DNA (cfDNA), are increasingly used to guide patient selection for clinical trials. These technologies are creating opportunities for earlier detection and treatment, and for ongoing monitoring for cancer recurrence before relapse becomes apparent in traditional imaging.

In some asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials, we are now using CompEx: a novel composite endpoint developed at AstraZeneca that combines exacerbations with other indicators of worsening asthma or COPD.1-3 This reduces the size and duration of studies needed when only exacerbations are recorded.

In chronic kidney disease (CKD), using a novel endpoint developed by academic researchers has reduced the time it takes to answer important questions about the treatment efficacy. Instead of using an event-based primary endpoint to study the impact of potassium-removing therapy in patients with CKD in the Phase III STABILIZE‑CKD trial, we are using reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time as an indicator of slowing of disease progression. In this way, it is possible to include patients with earlier stage disease when few major events, such as need for dialysis or transplantation or death, would be expected to happen. 

In late-stage cardiovascular trials, Automating Identification Detection Adjudication (AIDA) has been developed to accelerate the classification and confirmation of events compared with standard procedures carried out by physicians.4 Following a study showing high consistency between automated and expert adjudication of cardiovascular (CV) events (ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack), we are now using the system in several studies, including DAPA‑MI, a registry-based trial in patients following a heart attack.

Reducing the environmental impact

Reducing the environmental impact is another key goal of designing clinical trials with patients in mind and this can happen at multiple levels.5 These include decreasing face-to-face meetings, reducing the number of wasted lab kits, shortening shipping times and cutting back on single-use plastic. We conducted a clinical trial lifecycle assessment to identify scope for reducing our trials’ carbon footprint and are now applying this information to reduce the environmental footprint of our studies. Indeed, the design of the DAPA-MI trial resulted in 45 percent fewer emissions compared to similar studies with more standard designs.

Improving the clinical trials experience

We are going beyond site-level recruitment, focusing our efforts on outreach and engaging with patients to ensure awareness of clinical trials is an option for treatment.

Having become familiar with online healthcare and volunteering for vaccine trials during the pandemic, patients are increasingly learning about clinical trials and accessing local participating centres through websites such as Breast Cancer Study Locator. It is hoped that this approach will increase the proportion of eligible patients who choose to participate in trials, from the current three percent and broaden the trial participant diversity.

Digital technologies may also facilitate patient recruitment through collaborations with healthcare services and academia, to identify patients in disease registries and longitudinal cohorts who could be eligible for clinical trials. These resources could also be used for patient follow up. In the DAPA-MI trial, treating physicians in registries can join the study and integrate it within their routine clinical practice, with automated data collection and reduced administrative workload.

Data analytics can identify patients who meet inclusion criteria for a clinical trial from large real‑world datasets, collected from multiple healthcare institutions. Approximately one third of US patients recruited to the Serena-6 trial in metastatic breast cancer have been recruited in this way.

It is also essential to work closely with research coordinators and investigators to understand how new studies can be integrated into clinical research workflows with minimal disruption, as is gaining patient insights during protocol design on the practicalities of participation. What is an acceptable number of clinic visits and duration for appointments? How many investigations and treatments can reasonably be carried out during a visit? What are the logistics of moving between departments, especially for someone who may feel unwell? Trial design must be flexible to accommodate patient needs, variations in infrastructure of participating centres, and patient preferences for in-clinic visits versus online consultations at home.

Harnessing data and digital solutions to augment clinical trial outcomes

Since well before the pandemic, AstraZeneca researchers have been testing clinical biomedical devices, including spirometers to test lung function of COPD patients in clinical trials, ‘home lab tests’ to monitor parameters such as creatinine as an indicator of CKD and ‘wearable devices’ to potentially monitor heart rate and blood pressure. We now estimate that up to 70 percent of data currently collected during hospital visits could be collected from patients at home via online questionnaires and monitoring devices. Today this is approximately only 10 percent.

Patients will not want to juggle multiple devices and apps to report data. Optimising the quality of the patient experience is essential if we are to achieve the benefits digital solutions can offer.

We plan to use Unify, a single app designed by collaboration of patients, healthcare professionals and AstraZeneca to simplify the trial experience for all participants, in 70-80 percent of our studies. Already available in nearly 30 countries and 65 languages, the app links information the patient needs about a clinical trial, including clinic visits and virtual consultations, medication reminders and patient reported outcomes. Trial investigators and clinicians use the same app to connect with patients, eg, for virtual consultations and to coach patients on using devices such as spirometers at home and to access data and support treatment adherence.

As we become confident in the viability and integrity of devices and apps that can be used at home, we move closer to the point of incorporating them into trials at scale. This could significantly reduce clinic visits for patients, administration for trialists and enable us to include patients who would have previously missed out on opportunities due to living too far from participating centres.

Where next for digital solutions in clinical trials?

Clinical innovation is not about a single app or sensor, it is about a different way of working with trial sites that recognises the value of patients and all those who provide their care.

Changing the way clinical trials have been performed for many years does not come without challenges and risks. Consulting widely with regulators as well as with patients and clinicians is vital to ensure the smooth integration of digital solutions into clinical trials.

In the longer term, digital healthcare has enormous potential not only for clinical innovation in clinical trials but in routine patient care. It offers opportunities for earlier diagnosis, faster treatment based on precision medicine and patient-friendly monitoring and ultimately, improved outcomes. 

Investigation launched into alleged animal welfare violations at Neuralink

Elon Musk’s brain computer interface (BCI) company Neuralink is being investigated by law enforcement authorities in the US amid allegations of animal welfare violations in its testing facilities.

Monkey_with_Neuralink_implant

Neuralink’s BCI is intended to treat conditions like blindness and spinal cord injury, as well as provide a way to interact with digital devices using the brain and, according to Musk, is on the brink of moving into the human testing stage.

A Reuters report claims that 1,500 animals have died during Neuralink’s testing of its implant device in four years, citing complaints made by staff at the company, who claim that Musk is creating a “pressure cooker environment” and pushing them to accelerate the development of the device.

That, in turn, is resulting in mistakes in experimental procedures that mean they have to be repeated, increasing the unnecessary loss of animal life, says the news wire. In one incident, it alleges, 25 of a cohort of 60 pigs were implanted with devices that were the wrong size, while others include rushed surgeries that have caused needless pain to animals.

Reuters said it has interviewed 20 current and former Neuralink employees in its investigation, as well as reviewing internal company documents.

Animal sacrifices are carried out routinely in biomedical research, so the total number of deaths reported does not in itself point to violations in research practices that would be covered by the US Animal Welfare Act, but the employees claim the number being euthanised is higher than it should be.

The news report also points to differences between Neuralink and rival Synchron, which has taken a BCI to treat neurological diseases that has already advanced into clinical trials. Animal testing of that device only resulted in the sacrifice of 80 animals, it claims.

Neuralink has already come under the scrutiny of groups, including the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine, which has called for the company to release data from its animal experiments, including side effects from the implant procedure, such as infections.

The procedure involves removing a section of the skull, with the coin-sized implant slotting into the hole above the brain and thousands of micron-scale electrodes or ‘threads’ inserted into brain tissue to monitor neural activity and create the interface between the brain and external devices. Other experiments involve placing the implant into a vertebra to access the spinal column.

Twitter owner Musk, who is a fervent user of the social media platform, has yet to make a comment on the development.

Earlier this year, Neuralink put out a blog post defending its use of animals in studies carried out at the University of California, Davis Primate Centre, saying accusations against it “come from people who oppose any use of animals in research.”

“Animals at Neuralink are respected and honoured by our team,” it asserted. “Without proper context, information from medical records and study data can be misleading.”

Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On Google PlusVisit Us On LinkedinVisit Us On Facebook